What Remains of the Fundamentum Inconcussum in Light of the Modern Sciences of Man?

Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (2):385-404 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Transcendental conceptions of subjectivity, beginning with Descartes and including Kant, Fichte, and Husserl as well as neo-transcendental accounts of the 20th century, try to explicate a subject’s subjectivity as a necessary condition for all theoretical and practical validity claims. According to this conception, only this subject-theoretical presupposition allows for an adequate foundation of terms of authorship of action and self-determination. However, the conceptual self-explication of this position faces some inherent difficulties, which has repeatedly been pointed out even by representatives of this school of thought themselves. Moreover, it seems as if the constitutional achievements of transcendental philosophy are increasingly being detached from philosophy: due to the development of the modern sciences of man, they are step by step conceived as objects of empirical research. This paper looks critically into this thesis of detachment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Critical Theory need strong foundations?Stephen K. White - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (3):207-211.
Husserl's Transcendental Subjectivity.Max Deutscher - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):21 - 45.
The transcendental and the psychological.John J. Drummond - 2008 - Husserl Studies 24 (3):193-204.
The Two Dimensions of Kant's Concept of Subject.Jianjun Wang - 2006 - Philosophy and Culture 33 (9):165-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-21

Downloads
16 (#898,367)

6 months
3 (#974,323)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kritik der reinen Vernunft.Immanuel Kant - 2020 - Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.

View all 26 references / Add more references