Who should fight domination? Individual responsibility and structural injustice

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 20 (2):180-201 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Who is responsible for fighting domination? Answering this question, I argue, requires taking the structural dimension of domination seriously to avoid unwillingly reproducing domination in the nam...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/1470594x211003333

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Does a Mugger Dominate? Episodic Power and the Structural Dimension of Domination.Dorothea Gädeke - 2019 - Journal of Political Philosophy 28 (2):199-221.
Global Gender Justice: Human Rights and Political Responsibility.Margaret A. McLaren - 2019 - Critical Horizons 20 (2):127-144.
Domination Across Borders: An Introduction.Barbara Buckinx, Jonathan Trejo-Mathys & Timothy Waligore - 2015 - In Barbara Buckinx, Jonathan Trejo-Mathys & Timothy Waligore (eds.), Domination and Global Political Justice: Conceptual, Historical and Institutional Perspectives. New York: Routledge. pp. 1-33.
Why economic agency matters: An account of structural domination in the economic realm.Rutger Claassen & Lisa Herzog - 2019 - European Journal of Political Theory 20 (3):465-485.
Structural domination in the labor market.Lillian Cicerchia - 2022 - European Journal of Political Theory 21 (1).
Republican Freedom in the Labour Market: Exploitation Without Interpersonal Domination.Fausto Corvino - 2019 - Theoria 66 (158):103-131.
Contemporary "Structures" of Racism.Justin I. Fugo - 2019 - Sartre Studies International 25 (2):57-76.
Democracy, Trust, and Epistemic Justice.Amandine Catala - 2015 - The Monist 98 (4):424-440.
Exploitation, Domination and Marxism.Nicholas Vrousalis - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 69:437-442.
Domination, Epistemic Injustice and Republican Epistemology.James Bohman - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (2):175-187.
From Neo-Republicanism to Critical Republicanism.Dorothea Gädeke - 2020 - In Bruno Leipold, Karma Nabulsi & Stuart White (eds.), Radical Republicanism. Recovering the Traditions' Popular Heritage. Oxford, Vereinigtes Königreich: pp. 21-39.
What is My Role in Changing the System? A New Model of Responsibility for Structural Injustice.Robin Zheng - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (4):869-885.
Are Workers Dominated?Tom O'Shea - 2019 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 16 (1).
Backward-looking reparations and structural injustice.Maeve McKeown - 2021 - Contemporary Political Theory 20 (4):771-794.
Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom?Miranda Fricker - 2013 - Synthese 190 (7):1317-1332.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-06

Downloads
61 (#262,462)

6 months
15 (#164,026)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dorothea Gädeke
Utrecht University

Citations of this work

Public justification, political values, and domination.Thomas M. Besch - forthcoming - In Thomas M. Besch, Raphael Van Riel, Harold Kincaid & Tarun Menon (eds.), Cultural domination: philosophical perspectives. Routledge (expected 2024).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government.Philip Pettit (ed.) - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
National Responsibility and Global Justice.David Miller - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model.Iris Marion Young - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):102-130.

View all 40 references / Add more references