Critical Horizons 20 (2):127-144 (2019)
Abstract |
ABSTRACTI argue that Iris Marion Young’s concept of political responsibility is well suited for transnational feminism analyses. Young’s work reveals the intersections of ethical, social, and political theory; her model of political responsibility articulates a view of shared social and political responsibility for the structural conditions of exploitation and domination. Young’s theory of political responsibility provides an account that views responsibility for social injustice as both deeply personal, and shared. She argues that we can only discharge our political responsibility by engaging with others in collective actions that seek to change unjust situation and institutions. I argue that Young’s model of political responsibility, because of its focus on structural injustice, provides a more nuanced account of global justice than either a human rights framework, or a cosmopolitan framework. Because Young’s theory of political responsibility focuses on structural injustice we can use it to analyze inequalities and asymmetries of power with respect to gender and in terms of structural injustice.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1080/14409917.2019.1596212 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model.Iris Marion Young - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):102-130.
Responsibility and Global Labor Justice.Iris Marion Young - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4):365-388.
Getting to the Root of Gender Inequality: Structural Injustice and Political Responsibility.Serena Parekh - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (4):672-689.
View all 7 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Global Gender Justice: Human Rights and Political Responsibility.Margaret A. McLaren - forthcoming - Tandf: Critical Horizons:1-18.
Why the West Is Perceived as Being Unworthy of Cooperation.Gorik Ooms - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):594-613.
Does Global Egalitarianism Provide an Impractical and Unattractive Ideal of Justice?Christian Barry & Pablo Gilabert - 2008 - International Affairs 84 (5):1025-1039.
“Are My Hands Clean?” Responsibility for Global Gender Disparities.Alison M. Jaggar - 2014 - In Diana Meyers (ed.), Poverty, Agency, and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Human Rights in Iran: The Ethnography of ‘Others’ and Global Political Theory.Christien Van Den Anker - 2008 - Journal of International Political Theory 4 (2):265-282.
Is Rooted Cosmopolitanism Bad for Women?Kathryn Walker - 2012 - Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):77-90.
Getting to the Root of Gender Inequality: Structural Injustice and Political Responsibility.Serena Parekh - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (4):672-689.
Introduction: The Philosophical Challenges of Global Gender Justice.Alison M. Jaggar - 2009 - Philosophical Topics 37 (2):1-15.
Gender Injustice and the Resource Curse: Feminist Assessment and Reform.Scott Wisor - 2013 - In Alison Jaggar (ed.), Gender and Global Justice. Polity. pp. 168-192.
Global Justice and the Limits of Human Rights.Dale Dorsey - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):562–581.
Feminist Theory, Global Gender Justice, and the Evaluation of Grant Making.Brooke A. Ackerly - 2009 - Philosophical Topics 37 (2):179-198.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-05-24
Total views
28 ( #406,087 of 2,499,680 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,778 of 2,499,680 )
2019-05-24
Total views
28 ( #406,087 of 2,499,680 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,778 of 2,499,680 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads