Prolegomenon to a history of prudence: A critical synthesis

Social Epistemology 1 (1):61 – 82 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-04

Downloads
37 (#118,170)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eugene Garver
University of Chicago (PhD)

Citations of this work

Prudence: Reply to Garver.Charles Jones - 1987 - Social Epistemology 1 (4):311 – 320.
Comment on Stoesz.Robert Hariman - 1988 - Social Epistemology 2 (2):155 – 162.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Habermas and Lyotard on postmodernity.Richard Rorty - 1985 - In Richard J. Bernstein (ed.), Habermas and modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 161--175.
Objectivity in Morality and Objectivity in Science.Alasdair MacIntyre - 1978 - In H. Tristram Englehardt, Jr & Daniel Callahan (eds.), Morals, Science and Sociality. Hastings Center. pp. 21-39.
Politics as rhetoric.Richard J. Burke - 1982 - Ethics 93 (1):45-55.

View all 6 references / Add more references