- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Problematic aspects of Anselm-of-canterbury modal ontological argument
Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 48 (3):587-609 (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Does Anselm beg the question?Keith Burgess-Jackson - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):5-18.
The relevance of Kant's objection to Anselm's ontological argument.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.
Is the ontological proof for God’s existence an ontological proof for God’s existence?Marcin Tkaczyk - 2007 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 16 (4):289-309.
Justification in theology, Anselm-of-canterbury ontological argument.K. Jacobi - 1992 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 99 (2):225-244.
The ontological argument.Graham Oppy - 2008 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of religion: classic and contemporary issues. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-30
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2014-03-30
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-ldh8k uwo