123 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Brian Leftow [123]Brian Lee Leftow [1]
See also
Brian Leftow
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
  1.  24
    Time and Eternity.Brian Leftow - 2018 - Cornell University Press.
    Brian Leftow makes an important contribution to the longstanding debate among philosophers and theologians about the nature of God's eternity. The author develops a powerful and original defense of the notion that God is eternal in that he exists timelessly; that is, that though God exists, he does not exist at any time. Leftow defends the claim that a timeless God can be an object of human experience, and he attempts to delineate the extent of such a God's omniscience. Finally, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  2. God and Necessity.Brian Leftow - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
    Modal basics -- Some solutions -- Theist solutions -- The ontology of possibility -- Modal truthmakers -- Modality and the divine nature -- Deity as essential -- Against deity theories -- The role of deity -- The biggest bang -- Divine concepts -- Concepts, syntax, and actualism -- Modality: basic notions -- The genesis of secular modality -- Modal reality -- Essences -- Non-secular modalities -- Theism and modal semantics -- Freedom, preference, and cost -- Explaining modal status -- Explaining (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  3. .Brian Leftow - 2002
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  4.  79
    Time and Eternity.Brian Leftow - 1991 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [I] Introduction The Western religions all claim that God is eternal. This claim finds strong expression in the Old Testament, which is common property of ...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  5. A Latin Trinity.Brian Leftow - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):304-333.
    Latin models of the Trinity begin from the existence of one God, and try to explain how one God can be three Persons. I offer an account of this based on an analogy with time-travel. A time-traveler returning to the same point in time repeatedly might have three successive events in his/her life occurring at that one location in public time. So too, God’s life might be such that three distinct parts of His life are always occurring at once, though (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  6. Why Perfect Being Theology?Brian Leftow - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):103-118.
    I display the historical roots of perfect being theology in Greco-Roman philosophy, and the distinctive reasons for Christians to take up a version of this project. I also rebut a recent argument that perfect-being reasoning should lead one to atheism.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  7. Is God an Abstract Object?Brian Leftow - 1990 - Noûs 24 (4):581-598.
    Before Duns Scotus, most philosophers agreed that God is identical with His necessary intrinsic attributes--omnipotence, omniscience, etc. This Identity Thesis was a component of widely held doctrines of divine simplicity, which stated that God exemplifies no metaphysical distinctions, including that between subject and attribute. The Identity Thesis seems to render God an attribute, an abstract object. This paper shows that the Identity Thesis follows from a basic theistic belief and does not render God abstract. If also discusses how one might (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  8. A Timeless God Incarnate.Brian Leftow - 2002 - In Stephen T. Davis, Daniel Kendall & Gerald O'Collins (eds.), The Incarnation. Oxford Up. pp. 273--299.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  9. Divine Simplicity and Divine Freedom.Brian Leftow - 2015 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 89:45-56.
    I explain the doctrine of divine simplicity, and reject what is now the standard way to explicate it in analytic philosophy. I show that divine simplicity imperils the claim that God is free, and argue against a popular proposal for dealing with the problem.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  10. Anti Social Trinitarianism.Brian Leftow - 1999 - In Trinity, The. Oxford University Press. pp. 203-249.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  11. Time and Eternity.Brian Leftow - 1992 - Religious Studies 28 (3):429-431.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  12. Divine Simplicity.Brian Leftow - 2006 - Faith and Philosophy 23 (4):365-380.
    Augustine, Aquinas and many other medievals held the doctrine of divine simplicity (DDS) -that God has no parts of any sort. Augustine took this to imply that for any non-relational attribute F, if God is F, God = Fness. This can seem to create three problems. I set them out. Having done so, I show that Augustine's DDS is set within a view of attributes now unfamiliar to us. When we bring this into the picture, it turns out that two (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  13. The Humanity of God.Brian Leftow - 2011 - In Anna Marmodoro & Jonathan Hill (eds.), The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  14.  70
    Omnipotence.Brian Leftow - 2009 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press.
    The doctrine that God is omnipotent takes its rise from Scriptural texts which concern two linked topics. One is how much power God has to put behind actions: enough that nothing is too hard, enough to do whatever he pleases. The other is how much God can do: ‘all things’. The link is obvious: we measure strength by what tasks it is adequate to perform, and God is so strong he can do all things. The Christian philosophical theologian who seeks (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  15.  53
    Tempting God.Brian Leftow - 2014 - Faith and Philosophy 31 (1):3-23.
    Western theism holds that God cannot do evil. Christians also hold that Christ is God the Son and that Christ was tempted to do evil. These claims appear to be jointly inconsistent. I argue that they are not.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  16. Swinburne on Divine Necessity.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (2):141-162.
    Most analytic philosophers hold that if God exists, He exists with broad logical necessity. Richard Swinburne denies the distinction between narrow and broad logical necessity, and argues that if God exists, His existence is narrow-logically contingent. A defender of divine broad logical necessity could grant the latter claim. I argue, however, that not only is God's existence broad-logically necessary, but on a certain understanding of God's relation to modality, it comes out narrow-logically necessary. This piece argues against Swinburne's overall account (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  17. Modes Without Modalism.Brian Leftow - 2007 - In Peter van Inwagen and Dean Zimmerman (ed.), Persons: Human and Divine. Oxford University Press. pp. 357--375.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  18.  25
    God, Time and Knowledge.Brian Leftow - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (2):444.
  19. The Ontological Argument.Brian Leftow - 2005 - In William J. Wainwright (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press.
    This chapter presents and critically discusses the main historical variants of the “ontological argument,” a form of a priori argument for the existence of God pioneered by Anselm of Canterbury. I assess the contributions of Anselm, Descartes, Leibniz, and Gödel, and criticisms by Gaunilo, Kant, and Oppy among others.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  20.  14
    Souls Dipped in Dust.Brian Leftow - 2001 - In Kevin J. Corcoran (ed.), Soul, Body, and Survival: Essays on the Metaphysics of Human Persons. Cornell University Press. pp. 120--138.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  21. On God and Necessity.Brian Leftow - 2014 - Faith and Philosophy 31 (4):435-459.
    My God and Necessity offers a theist a theory of modal truth. Two recent articles criticize the theory’s motivation and main features. I reply to these criticisms.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  22. No Best World: Moral Luck.Brian Leftow - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (2):165-181.
    William Rowe and others argue that if ours is a possible world than which there is a better, it follows that God does not exist. If this is correct, then if there is no best possible world, it is not so much as possible that God exist. I reject the key premise of Rowe's argument. The key to seeing that it is false, I suggest, is seeing that God is subject to something fairly called moral luck. In this first part (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  23.  89
    No Best World: Creaturely Freedom.Brian Leftow - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (3):269-285.
    William Rowe and others argue that if this is a possible world than which there is a better, it follows that God does not exist. I now reject the key premise of Rowe's argument. I do so first within a Molinist framework. I then show that this framework is dispensable: really all one needs to block the better-world argument is the assumption that creatures have libertarian free will. I also foreclose what might seem a promising way around the 'moral-luck' counter (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  24. God’s Deontic Perfection.Brian Leftow - 2013 - Res Philosophica 90 (1):69-95.
    I offer part of an account of divine moral perfection. I defend the claim that moral perfection is possible, then argue that God has obligations, so that one part of his moral perfection must be perfection in meeting these. I take up objections to divine obligations, then finally offer a definition of divine deontic perfection.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  25.  36
    Two Trinities: Reply to Hasker.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):441 - 447.
    William Hasker replies to my arguments against social Trinitarianism, offers some criticism of my own view, and begins a sketch of another account of the Trinity. I reply with some defence of my own theory and some questions about his.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  26.  9
    The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge.Brian Leftow - 1991 - Ethics 103 (1):163-164.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  27. Perfection and Possibility.Brian Leftow - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (4):423-431.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28. The Cambridge Companion to Anselm.Brian Davies & Brian Leftow - 2006 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59 (2):117-120.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  29.  67
    The Trinity is Unconstitutional.Brian Leftow - 2018 - Religious Studies 54 (3):359-376.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30. God and Abstract Entities.Brian Leftow - 1990 - Faith and Philosophy 7 (2):193-217.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  31. A Leibnizian Cosmological Argument.Brian Leftow - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 57 (2):135 - 155.
    I explicate and defend leibniz's argument from "eternal truths" to the existence of god. I argue that necessary beings can be caused to exist, Showing how one can apply a counterfactual analysis to such causation, Then argue that if such beings can be caused to exist, They are.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  32. Anselm's Perfect Being Theology.Brian Leftow - 2004 - In The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press. pp. 132--156.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  33. Necessity.Brian Leftow - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro & Chad V. Meister (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology. Cambridge University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  34. Impossible Worlds.Brian Leftow - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (4):393-402.
    Richard Brian Davis offers several criticisms of a semantics I once proposed for subjunctive conditionals with impossible antecedents. I reply to these.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  35.  56
    Eternity and Simultaneity.Brian Leftow - 1991 - Faith and Philosophy 8 (2):148-179.
  36. Soul, Mind and Brain.Brian Leftow - 2009 - In Robert C. Koons & George Bealer (eds.), The Waning of Materialism: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
  37. A Naturalist Cosmological Argument.Brian Leftow - 2017 - Religious Studies 53 (3):321-338.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  45
    The Cambridge Companion to Anselm.Brian Leftow (ed.) - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
    Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109), Benedictine monk and the second Norman archbishop of Canterbury, is regarded as one of the most important philosophers and theologians of the Middle Ages. The essays in this volume explore all of his major ideas both philosophical and theological, including his teachings on faith and reason, God's existence and nature, logic, freedom, truth, ethics, and key Christian doctrines. There is also discussion of his life, the sources of his thought, and his influence on other thinkers. New (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  39.  98
    Aquinas on Attributes.Brian Leftow - 2003 - Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):1-41.
  40. Anselmian Presentism.Brian Leftow - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):297-319.
    I rebut four claims made in a recent article by Katherin Rogers. En route I discuss how a timeless God might perceive all of “tensed” time at once.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  41.  73
    11. God and the Problem of Universals.Brian Leftow - 2006 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 2:325.
  42. The Nature of Necessity.Brian Leftow - 2017 - Res Philosophica 94 (3):359-383.
    I give an account of the nature of absolute or metaphysical necessity. Absolute-necessarily P, I suggest, just if it is always the case that P and there never is or was a power with a chance to bring it about, bring about a power to bring it about, etc., that not P. I display both advantages and a cost of this sort of definition.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43.  54
    Composition and Christology.Brian Leftow - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):310-322.
    One central claim of orthodox Christianity is that in Jesus of Nazareth, God became man. On Chalcedonian orthodoxy, this involves one person, God the Son, having two natures, divine and human. If He does, one person has two properties, deity and humanity. But the Incarnation also involves concrete objects, God the Son (GS), Jesus’s human body (B) and—I will assume—Jesus’s human soul (S). If God becomes human, GS, B and S somehow become one thing. It would be good to have (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  44.  74
    Anselm on Omnipresence.Brian Leftow - 1989 - New Scholasticism 63 (3):326-357.
  45.  36
    Two Trinities: Reply to Hasker: Brian Leftow.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):441-447.
    William Hasker replies to my arguments against Social Trinitarianism, offers some criticism of my own view, and begins a sketch of another account of the Trinity. I reply with some defence of my own theory and some questions about his.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  46. Immutability.Brian Leftow - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  47. Aquinas on Time and Eternity.Brian Leftow - 1990 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 64 (3):387-399.
  48. Necessary Moral Perfection.Brian Leftow - 1989 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (3):240-260.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  49.  85
    Time Travel and the Trinity.Brian Leftow - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):313-324.
    I have used a time travel story to model the “Latin” version of the Trinity. William Hasker’s “A Leftovian Trinity?” criticizes my arguments. This piece replies.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  50. One Step Toward God.Brian Leftow - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 68:67-103.
    I describe a new argument for the existence of God, and argue one of its steps. En route I criticize class-nominalist theories of attributes, and sketch an alternate theory involving God.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 123