Boonin on the future-like-ours argument against abortion

Bioethics 21 (6):324–328 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that David Boonin has failed in his attempt to undermine Donald Marquis's future-like-ours argument against abortion. I show that the ethical principle advanced by Boonin in his critique to that argument is unable, contrary to what he claims, to account for the wrongness of infanticide. Then I argue that Boonin's critique misrepresents Marquis's argument. Although there is a way to restate his critique in order to avoid the misrepresentation, the success of such restatement is precluded by the wrongness of infanticide

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Uma Defesa do Argumento de Marquis Contra o Aborto.Pedro Galvão - 2005 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (25):169-185.
A Natural Response to Boonin.Andrew J. Peach - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):357-376.
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
A future like ours revisited.M. T. Brown - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):192-195.
Animalism, Abortion, and a Future Like Ours.Andrea Sauchelli - 2019 - The Journal of Ethics 23 (3):317-332.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
95 (#177,760)

6 months
6 (#702,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pedro Galvão
University of Lisbon

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why abortion is immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.

Add more references