Should my robot know what's best for me? Human–robot interaction between user experience and ethical design
AI and Society 37 (2):517-533 (2022)
Abstract
To integrate social robots in real-life contexts, it is crucial that they are accepted by the users. Acceptance is not only related to the functionality of the robot but also strongly depends on how the user experiences the interaction. Established design principles from usability and user experience research can be applied to the realm of human–robot interaction, to design robot behavior for the comfort and well-being of the user. Focusing the design on these aspects alone, however, comes with certain ethical challenges, especially regarding the user’s privacy and autonomy. Based on an example scenario of human–robot interaction in elder care, this paper discusses how established design principles can be used in social robotic design. It then juxtaposes these with ethical considerations such as privacy and user autonomy. Combining user experience and ethical perspectives, we propose adjustments to the original design principles and canvass our own design recommendations for a positive and ethically acceptable social human–robot interaction design. In doing so, we show that positive user experience and ethical design may be sometimes at odds, but can be reconciled in many cases, if designers are willing to adjust and amend time-tested design principles.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1007/s00146-021-01210-3
My notes
Similar books and articles
Nudging for good: robots and the ethical appropriateness of nurturing empathy and charitable behavior.Borenstein Jason & C. Arkin Ronald - 2017 - AI and Society 32 (4):499-507.
Designing Virtuous Sex Robots.Anco Peeters & Pim Haselager - 2019 - International Journal of Social Robotics:1-12.
Exploring the effect of a user’s personality traits on tactile communication with a robot using Bayesian networks.Jungsik Hwang & Kun Chang Lee - 2015 - Interaction Studies 16 (1):29-53.
Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics.David Feil-Seifer, Kristine Skinner & Maja J. Matarić - 2007 - Interaction Studies 8 (3):423-439.
La sparizione del design. Parte II: Less is Less.Lorenzo Marras & Andrea Mecacci - 2014 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 7 (1):153-175.
More Than a Feeling—Interrelation of Trust Layers in Human-Robot Interaction and the Role of User Dispositions and State Anxiety.Linda Miller, Johannes Kraus, Franziska Babel & Martin Baumann - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Improving HRI design by applying Systemic Interaction Analysis.Manja Lohse, Marc Hanheide, Karola Pitsch, Katharina J. Rohlfing & Gerhard Sagerer - 2009 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 10 (3):298-323.
Cooperative gazing behaviors in human multi-robot interaction.Tian Xu, Hui Zhang & Chen Yu - 2013 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 14 (3):390-418.
Companion robots: the hallucinatory danger of human-robot interactions.Piercosma Bisconti & Daniele Nardi - 2018 - In AIES '18: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. pp. 17-22.
Systematic analysis of video data from different human–robot interaction studies: a categorization of social signals during error situations.Manuel Giuliani, Nicole Mirnig, Gerald Stollnberger, Susanne Stadler, Roland Buchner & Manfred Tscheligi - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Exploring the effect of a user’s personality traits on tactile communication with a robot using Bayesian networks.Jungsik Hwang & Kun Chang Lee - 2015 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 16 (1):29-53.
The tactile ethics of soft robotics: designing wisely for human–robot interaction.Thomas Arnold & Matthias Scheutz - 2017 - Soft Robotics 4 (2):81-87.
Do relative positions and proxemics affect the engagement in a human-robot collaborative scenario?Fotios Papadopoulos, Dennis Küster, Lee J. Corrigan, Arvid Kappas & Ginevra Castellano - 2016 - Latest Issue of Interaction Studies 17 (3):321-347.
Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics.David Feil-Seifer, Kristine Skinner & Maja J. Matarić - 2007 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 8 (3):423-439.
The effects of exposure to different social robots on attitudes toward preferences.Evgenios Vlachos, Elizabeth Jochum & Louis-Philippe Demers - 2016 - Interaction Studies 17 (3):390-404.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-04-29
Downloads
20 (#565,757)
6 months
4 (#184,255)
2021-04-29
Downloads
20 (#565,757)
6 months
4 (#184,255)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Introduction: special issue—critical robotics research.Sofia Serholt, Sara Ljungblad & Niamh Ní Bhroin - 2022 - AI and Society 37 (2):417-423.
References found in this work
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Jürgen Habermas (ed.) - 1996 - Polity.
Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.