- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Facing Up to Scarcity: The Logic and Limits of Nonconsequentialist Thought
Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press (2020)
Abstract
Barbara H. Fried presents a powerful critique of the nonconsequentialist approaches that have been dominant in recent Anglophone moral and political thought. She argues that nonconsequentialist theories have disastrous consequences in the political domain and are inadequate at dealing with conflicts of individual interests in the moral domain.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Barbara H. Fried: Facing Up to Scarcity: The Logic and Limits of Nonconsequentialist Thought. [REVIEW]J. L. A. Donohue - 2021 - Faith and Philosophy 38 (2):274-279.
Facing Up to Scarcity: The Logic and Limits of Nonconsequentialist Thought, Barbara H. Fried. Oxford University Press, 2020, xvi+269 pages. [REVIEW]Susanne Burri - 2021 - Economics and Philosophy 37 (2):321-327.
A Royal Road to Consequentialism?Martin Peterson - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2):153-169.
The Moral Target: Aiming at Right Conduct in War and Other Conflicts.F. M. Kamm - 2012 - New York, US: Oup Usa.
Resolving moral conflicts: British Idealist and contemporary liberal approaches to value pluralism and moral conduct.Maria Dimova-Cookson - 2006 - In Maria Dimova-Cookson & William J. Mander (eds.), T.H. Green: ethics, metaphysics, and political philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Resolving moral conflicts : British idealist and contemporary liberal approaches to value pluralism and moral conduct.Maria Dimova-Cookson - 2006 - In Maria Dimova-Cookson & William J. Mander (eds.), T.H. Green: ethics, metaphysics, and political philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonconsequentialist decisions.Jonathan Baron - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):1-10. Translated by Jonathan Baron.
Consequentialism and the Agent’s Point of View.Nathan Robert Howard - 2022 - Ethics 132 (4):787-816.
T.H. Green: ethics, metaphysics, and political philosophy.Maria Dimova-Cookson & William J. Mander (eds.) - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-03-18
Downloads
13 (#1,310,210)
6 months
6 (#825,551)
2020-03-18
Downloads
13 (#1,310,210)
6 months
6 (#825,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Conceptualising morally permissible risk imposition without quantified individual risks.Susanne Burri - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-22.
Is Income Redistribution a Violation of the Categorical Imperative?Konstantin Morozov - 2024 - Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity 9 (3):90-98.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-snkrx uwo