Acta Analytica 25 (3):279-284 (2010)

Authors
Eric Wiland
University of Missouri, St. Louis
Abstract
J.J.C. Smart famously complained that rule utilitarianism is incoherent, and that rule utilitarians are guilty of rule worship . Much has been said about whether Smart’s complaint is justified, but I will assume for the sake of argument that Smart was on to something. Instead, I have three other goals. First, I want to show that Smart’s complaint is a specific instance of a more general objection to a moral theory—what I will call the Incoherence Objection. Second, I want to illustrate how the Incoherence Objection can apply both to consequentialist and, surprisingly, some nonconsequentialist theories. Finally, I want to demonstrate at least one way nonconsequentialist theories that make use of rules, principles, and the like can dodge the Incoherence Objection
Keywords Utilitarianism  Deontology  Consequentialism  Rules  Moral theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12136-010-0098-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism.David Lyons - 1965 - Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Practical Induction.Elijah Millgram - 1997 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism.J. J. C. Smart - 1956 - Philosophical Quarterly 6 (25):344-354.
Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism.A. D. Woozley - 1967 - Philosophical Quarterly 17 (67):183-184.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism.Alex Rajczi - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):857-876.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rules and Their Reasons: Mill on Morality and Instrumental Rationality.Ben Eggleston - 2011 - In Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & David Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-93.
The Incoherence of Coherence Theories.Richard Fumerton - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:89-102.
Mill, Rule Utilitarianism, and the Incoherence Objection.Dale E. Miller - 2011 - In Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & D. Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press. pp. 94.
Is There a Logic of Incoherence?Andre Kukla - 1995 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1):59 – 71.
Objective Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics.Alastair Wilson - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):709-737.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-06-30

Total views
72 ( #152,650 of 2,461,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,013 of 2,461,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes