Syntactic Properties of P-Consequence

Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (4):285-295 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

p-consequence is intended as a formalization of non-deductive reasoning. So far semantical or general properties have been presented more thoroughly ([2]–[5]). In the present paper we would like to focus on its syntactic properties

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biconsequences.Szymon Frankowski - 2010 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 19 (4):353-364.
Logical Consequence in Modal Logic.John Corcoran & George Weaver - 1969 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 10 (4):370-384.
A characterization of consequence operations preserving degrees of truth.Marek Nowak - 1987 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 16 (4):159-165.
Obligation as Optimal Goal Satisfaction.Robert Kowalski & Ken Satoh - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (4):579-609.
It might have been Classical Logic.Diderik Batens - 2012 - Logique Et Analyse 55 (218):241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
76 (#212,817)

6 months
15 (#234,986)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Plausible reasoning expressed by p-consequence.Szymon Frankowski - 2008 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 37 (3/4):161-170.
Intuitionistic Logic.Dirk van Dalen - 2002 - In D. M. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds.), ¸ Itegabbay2002. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1-115.
Formalization of a plausible inference.Szymon Frankowski - 2004 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 33 (1):41--52.
On the Lattice of p-consequences.Szymon Frankowski - 2010 - Reports on Mathematical Logic:23-35.

Add more references