Biconsequences

Logic and Logical Philosophy 19 (4):353-364 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

p-consequence (plausible consequence; see [2]) allows for a formulation of non-deductive reasonings, i.e., such where the conclusion has weaker justification then assumptions and thus when added to the set of assumptions results in its extension. But theoretical modesty of p-consequence operation does not tell the difference between “good” and “worse” conclusions. Therefore the bisconsequence is introduced

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
22 (#692,982)

6 months
11 (#225,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

P-consequence versus q-consequence operations.Szymon Frankowski - 2004 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 33 (4):197-207.
Plausible reasoning expressed by p-consequence.Szymon Frankowski - 2008 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 37 (3/4):161-170.
Entailment relations and/as truth values.Yaroslav Shramko & Heinrich Wansing - 2007 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 36 (3/4):131-143.
Formalization of a plausible inference.Szymon Frankowski - 2004 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 33 (1):41--52.
On the Lattice of p-consequences.Szymon Frankowski - 2010 - Reports on Mathematical Logic:23-35.

Add more references