It might have been Classical Logic

Logique Et Analyse 55 (218):241 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, a propositional logic Q is presented. This logic is more attractive than classical propositional logic P for explicating actual proofs. Moreover, while Q and P assign the same consequence set to consistent premise sets, Q assigns a sensible and non-trivial consequence set to inconsistent premise sets

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contradiction and contrariety. Priest on negation.Heinrich Wansing - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):81-93.
Substructural Logics.Greg Restall - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Blocks. The Clue to Dynamic Aspects of Logic.Diderik Batens - 1995 - Logique and Analyse 150:285-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-29

Downloads
42 (#370,986)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Diderik Batens
University of Ghent

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references