- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Philosophy of science: the link between science and philosophy
Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications (1957)
Abstract
A great mathematician and teacher, and a physicist and philosopher in his own right, bridges the gap between science and the humanities in this exposition of the philosophy of science. He traces the history of science from Aristotle to Einstein to illustrate philosophy's ongoing role in the scientific process. In this volume he explains modern technology's gradual erosion of the rapport between physical theories and philosophical systems, and offers suggestions for restoring the link between these related areas. This book is suitable for undergraduate students and other readers. 1962 ed. Index. 36 figures.
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Uncertain knowledge: an image of science for a changing world.R. G. A. Dolby - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science.Michael R. Matthews - 1994 - Routledge.
The misrepresentation of science by philosophers and teachers of science.Garth D. Benson - 1989 - Synthese 80 (1):107 - 119.
Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk.Massimo Pigliucci - 2010 - University of Chicago Press.
Scientific inquiry: readings in the philosophy of science.Robert Klee (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Is the philosophy of science scientific?A. Cornelius Benjamin - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (4):351-358.
Interpreting Science.Arthur Fine - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:3 - 11.
Science and the modern mind.P. W. Bridgman, Philipp Frank & Gerald James Holton (eds.) - 1971 - Freeport, N.Y.,: Books for Libraries Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
95 (#181,011)
6 months
10 (#265,304)
2009-01-28
Downloads
95 (#181,011)
6 months
10 (#265,304)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Who's afraid of absolute space?John Earman - 1970 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):287-319.
American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: The Early Years.Thomas Uebel - 2015 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 3 (3).
Austrian economics without extreme apriorism: construing the fundamental axiom of praxeology as analytic.Alexander Linsbichler - 2021 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 14):3359-3390.
Lost wanderers in the forest of knowledge: Some thoughts on the discovery-justification distinction.Don Howard - 2006 - In Jutta Schickore & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction. Springer. pp. 3--22.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo