Authors
Florian Franken Figueiredo
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Abstract
The word ‘persuasion’ can be used in two different ways. It can either implicate a process of changing someone’s belief or action without any argumentative justification or, to the contrary, indicate that the changes are indeed a result of argumentative discourse. These two different uses are part of a conceptual development in the history of philosophy. Nowadays they are often placed in contrast to each other, whereby persuasion in philosophy as a non-argumentative act is taken as doubtful and even unsound. In the following paper I argue that the two types of processes should not be conceived of as incompatible, taking some notes from Wittgenstein’s On Certainty as an argumentative source. I will show that persuading as a rational practice is based on the possibility of persuasion as a process of inculcation. These processes can help illuminate the notions of good grounds, reasons and persuasion. In contrast to the common perspective, I will show that they are actually the normal case regarding interaction between humans and thus fundamentally provide the possibility of an argumentative practice of giving and accepting reasons. I conclude that the primacy of argumentative persuasion in relation to inculcation needs to be reversed and the common understanding of human beings as genuine rational acting beings needs to be questioned.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/dzph-2015-0003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Überreden und Begründen.Ernst Tugendhat - 1996 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 44 (2):245-248.
Propositionen.Marian David - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 23 (1):37-58.
Relativismus, Realismus, Mathematik.Alex Burri - 1993 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 44 (1):293-312.
Rhetorik.Gerd Roellecke - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 96 (3):397-404.
O fanatizmu.Zoran Kindjic - 2008 - Filozofija I Društvo 19 (1):295-304.
Theorien der Emergenz - Metaphysik oder?Achim Stephan - 1994 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 48 (1):105-115.
Die Rollen von Regeln beim Handeln.Marco Iorio - 2009 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 63 (3):392-416.
Ein Dilemma für modale Argumente gegen den Materialismus.Sebastian J. Mueller - 2013 - Was Dürfen Wir Glauben? Was Sollen Wir Tun? Sektionsbeiträge des Achten Internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie E.V.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-07

Total views
26 ( #436,160 of 2,498,126 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #212,593 of 2,498,126 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes