Special Sciences, or The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis

In . pp. 120-133 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Special Sciences, or Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.Jerry Fodor - 1974 - Synthese 28 (2):97--115.
Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis).J. Fodor - 1974 - Synthese 28 (2):97-115.
Posebne nauke, ili nejedinstvo nauke kao radna hipoteza-Jerry A. Fodor: Special science, or The disunity of science as a working hypothesis', Synthese, 28 (1974), pp. 97-115. [REVIEW]Jerry A. Fodor - 1994 - Theoria 37 (1):67-84.
18 Special Sciences (or: The Disunity of Science as).Jerry A. Fodor - 2002 - In David J. Chalmers (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press. pp. 126.
Special sciences: Still a flawed argument after all these years.Todd Edwin Jones - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (3):409-432.
Rethinking unity as a "working hypothesis" for philosophy: How archaeologists exploit the disunities of science.Alison Wylie - 1999 - Perspectives on Science 7 (3):293-317.
Why is there anything except physics?Barry Loewer - 2009 - Synthese 170 (2):217 - 233.
What Is an Immature Science?Ruth Hibbert - 2016 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30 (1):1-17.
Modern Science Key Trends: Disunity and Fractionation.Dmitry Nikolaev - unknown
Ph.D. Abstract – On the Disunity of the Sciences.Emma Tobin - unknown - /A.
The Disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power.Peter Galison & David J. Stump (eds.) - 1996 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Resisting the tyranny of terminology: The general dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science.Terence Horgan & John Tienson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):643-643.
A Theory of Non-universal Laws.Alexander Reutlinger - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):97 - 117.
Going local: a defense of methodological localism about scientific realism.Jamin Asay - 2019 - Synthese 196 (2):587-609.
The Disunities of the Sciences.Ian Hacking - 1996 - In Peter Galison & David Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. pp. 37-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-12

Downloads
1 (#1,905,497)

6 months
1 (#1,478,518)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Physicalism.Daniel Stoljar - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Naturalism.Davidn D. Papineau - 2007 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scientific Reduction.Raphael van Riel & Robert Van Gulick - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Unity of Science.Jordi Cat - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references