18 Special Sciences (or: The Disunity of Science as)

In David J. Chalmers (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press. pp. 126 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why is there anything except physics?Barry Loewer - 2009 - Synthese 170 (2):217 - 233.
A Theory of Non-universal Laws.Alexander Reutlinger - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):97 - 117.
The Disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power.Peter Galison & David J. Stump (eds.) - 1996 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Learning from disunity.Jennifer Radden - 2003 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (4):357-359.
Special Sciences Jerry Fodor.Jerry Fodor - 1991 - In Richard Boyd, Philip Gasper & J. D. Trout (eds.), The Philosophy of Science. MIT Press. pp. 429.
Instrumental Biology, or the Disunity of Science.Alexander Rosenberg - 1994 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Against Laws in the Special Sciences.Jaegwon Kim - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37 (9999):103-122.
Commentary on Jaegwon Kim, "Laws, Causation, and Explanation in the Special Sciences".Michael Sollberger - 2005 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27 (3/4):339 - 344.
Historical kinds and the "special sciences".Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 95 (1-2):45-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references