Wittgenstein, Language, and the Trinity

TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 8 (1) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theistic religions differ in their conceptions of the nature of God. One philosophical-theological position, the Christian Trinity, stands out as unique amongst theistic religions. If such a position were demonstrated, it would significantly narrow the philosophical-theological gap in discussions of God’s nature. I proposed that such an argument in favor of the Christian Trinity can be found in Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language. It is argued that language is an essentially social phenomenon and that God is a language user requiring God to be an essentially social being. As a result, either polytheism or the Christian Trinity is true. I argue that this divine social nature is best explained by the Christian Trinity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The One Divine Nature.William Hasker - 2019 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 3 (2).
Christianity and philosophy.D. Miall Edwards - 1932 - Edinburgh,: T. & T. Clark.
The Christian God.Richard Swinburne - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Trinity.Michael C. Rea - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 403--429.
Trinity, Temporality, and Open Theism.Richard Rice - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):321-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-01

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references