Logic and Discrimination

History and Philosophy of Logic 45 (1):46-57 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper is about the connection between logic and discrimination, with special focus on Plumwood’s ideas in her groundbreaking article ‘The Politics of Reason. Towards a Feminist Logic’ (1993). Although Plumwood’s paper is not focused on the notion of discrimination, what she writes is useful for illuminating some basic mechanisms of thought that are at the basis of discriminatory practices. After an introductory section about the concepts of logic and discrimination and their possible interconnections, I present Plumwood’s ideas in 1993 with a special focus on their relevance for understanding the nature of discrimination. More specifically, I use examples of discriminatory practices that make the connection between logical operations and oppression envisaged by Plumwood clear. I focus especially on two questions: Can logic produce discrimination? Can logic contribute to the fight against discrimination? If so, how?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Towards a Feminist Logic: Val Plumwood’s Legacy and Beyond.Maureen Eckert & Charlie Donahue - 2020 - In Dominic Hyde (ed.), Noneist Explorations II: The Sylvan Jungle - Volume 3 (Synthese Library, 432). Dordrecht: pp. 424-448.
Feminist Logic, Literally.Ivan Restović - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Logic 20 (2):318-347.
(What) Is Feminist Logic? (What) Do We Want It to Be?Catharine Saint-Croix & Roy T. Cook - 2024 - History and Philosophy of Logic 45 (1):20-45.
Normativity and its vindication: The case of Logic.Concha Martínez Vidal - 2010 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 19 (2):191-206.
Normativity and its vindication: The case of Logic.Concha Martínez Vidal - 2010 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 19 (2):191-206.
From Anti-exceptionalism to Feminist Logic.Gillian Russell - forthcoming - Hypatia (Online first):1-19.
Three Misrepresentations of Logic.Brian MacPherson - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (2):185–199.
The liberation argument for inconsistent mathematics.Franci Mangraviti - 2023 - Australasian Journal of Logic 29 (2):278-315.
Feminism and the logic of alterity.V. Plumwood - 2002 - In Rachel Joffe Falmagne & Marjorie Hass (eds.), Representing Reason: Feminist Theory and Formal Logic. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 45–70.
Normativity and its vindications: the case of logic.Concepción Martínez Vidal - 2004 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 19 (2):191-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-22

Downloads
18 (#819,350)

6 months
18 (#137,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elena Ficara
University of Cologne (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer & Ross T. Brady - 1982 - Ridgeview. Edited by Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady.
Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Studia Logica 48 (2):260-261.
Logic isn’t normative.Gillian Russell - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (3-4):371-388.

View all 32 references / Add more references