Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-33 (forthcoming)

Authors
Abstract
Many analyses of notion of metainferences in the non-transitive logic ST have tackled the question of whether ST can be identified with classical logic. In this paper, we argue that the primary analyses are overly restrictive of the notion of metainference. We offer a more elegant and tractable semantics for the strict-tolerant hierarchy based on the three-valued function for the LP material conditional. This semantics can be shown to easily handle the introduction of mixed inferences, i.e., inferences involving objects belonging to more than one inferential level and solves several other limitations of the ST hierarchies introduced by Barrio, Pailos, and Szmuc.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10992-021-09630-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Almost Deep Degree.Peter Cholak, Marcia Groszek & Theodore Slaman - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):881-901.
An Almost Deep Degree.Peter Cholak, Marcia Groszek & Theodore Slaman - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):881-901.
On the Logical Philosophy of Assertive Graphs.Daniele Chiffi & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - 2020 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 29 (4):375-397.
The Logics of Strict-Tolerant Logic.Eduardo Barrio, Lucas Rosenblatt & Diego Tajer - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (5):551-571.
The Methodological Usefulness of Deep Disagreement.Steven W. Patterson - 2015 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 6 (2).
Inferences and Metainferences in ST.Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egré, David Ripley & Robert van Rooij - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (6):1057-1077.
Dōgen, Deep Ecology, and the Ecological Self.Deane Curtin - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
Dōgen, Deep Ecology, and the Ecological Self.Deane Curtin - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):195-213.
Wittgenstein and the Logic of Deep Disagreement.David Godden & William H. Brenner - 2010 - Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation 2:41-80.
What is Deep Disagreement?Chris Ranalli - 2018 - Topoi 40 (5):983-998.
How Many Notions of Necessity?Jordan Stein - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):605-627.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-11-20

Total views
10 ( #896,109 of 2,498,778 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,793 of 2,498,778 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes