- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Infants chunk object arrays into sets of individuals
Cognition 91 (2):173-190 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
A double-dissociation in infants' representations of object arrays.Lisa Feigenson - 2005 - Cognition 95 (3):B37-B48.
On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays.Lisa Feigenson & Susan Carey - 2005 - Cognition 97 (3):295-313.
All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations.Daniel C. Hyde & Elizabeth S. Spelke - unknown
Beyond 'what'and 'how many': Capacity, complexity, and resolution of infants' object representations.Jennifer M. Zosh & Lisa Feigenson - 2009 - In Bruce M. Hood & Laurie Santos (eds.), The origins of object knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 25--51.
Beyond 'what' and 'how many': Capacity, complexity and resolution of infants' object representations.Jennifer M. Zosh & Feigenson & Lisa - 2009 - In Bruce M. Hood & Laurie Santos (eds.), The origins of object knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Situating situated multimodal perception: The relevance of global arrays to development.David J. Lewkowicz & Christian Scheier - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):225-226.
Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy* 1.Philip J. Kellman & Elizabeth S. Spelke - 1983 - Cognitive Psychology 15 (4):483â524.
Infants' sensitivity to effects of gravity on visible object motion.In Kyeong Kim & Elizabeth S. Spelke - unknown
Infants reach to location a without practice or training.Laraine McDonough - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):54-54.
Set representations required for the acquisition of the “natural number” concept.Justin Halberda & Lisa Feigenson - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):655-656.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
38 (#412,027)
6 months
3 (#992,575)
2014-01-20
Downloads
38 (#412,027)
6 months
3 (#992,575)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles.Mathieu Le Corre & Susan Carey - 2007 - Cognition 105 (2):395-438.
From numerical concepts to concepts of number.Lance J. Rips, Amber Bloomfield & Jennifer Asmuth - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):623-642.
On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays.Lisa Feigenson & Susan Carey - 2005 - Cognition 97 (3):295-313.
Open questions and a proposal: A critical review of the evidence on infant numerical abilities.Lisa Cantrell & Linda B. Smith - 2013 - Cognition 128 (3):331-352.
References found in this work
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.George A. Miller - 1956 - Psychological Review 63 (2):81-97.
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Nelson Cowan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):87-114.
Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Anne Treisman & Stephen Gormican - 1988 - Psychological Review 95 (1):15-48.
Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.Zenon Pylyshyn - manuscript
Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.C. R. Gallistel & Rochel Gelman - 1992 - Cognition 44 (1-2):43-74.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo