Hume’s Finite Geometry: A Reply to Mark Pressman

Hume Studies 26 (1):183-185 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Hume on Geometry and Infinite Divisibility in the Treatise”, H. Mark Pressman charges that “the geometry Hume presents in the Treatise faces a serious set of problems”. This may well be; however, at least one of the charges Pressman levels against Hume invokes a false dichotomy, and a second rests on a non sequitur.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume's theory of space and time in its sceptical context.Donald L. M. Baxter - 1993 - In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 105-146.
From inexactness to certainty: The change in Hume's conception of geometry.Vadim Batitsky - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (1):1-20.
Hume on Infinite Divisibility and Sensible Extensionless Indivisibles.Dale Jacquette - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1):61-78.
Hume on Space and Geometry.Rosemary Newman - 1981 - Hume Studies 7 (1):1-31.
Infinite Divisibility in Hume's Treatise.Antony Flew - 1976 - In Livingston and King (ed.), Hume: A Re-evaluation. pp. 257--69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
70 (#81,795)

6 months
14 (#987,135)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lorne Falkenstein
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

Certainly useless: empiricists’ uncomfortable relationship with intuition.Lewis Powell - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (4):724-743.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references