The concept of statistical significance and the controversy about one-tailed tests

Psychological Review 67 (4):269-271 (1960)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A note on one-tailed and two-tailed tests.W. E. Hick - 1952 - Psychological Review 59 (4):316-318.
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.
Costs and benefits of statistical significance tests.Michael G. Shafto - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
Statistical significance: A statistician's view.Helena Chmura Kraemer - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):206-207.
Austere Realism and the Worldly Assumptions of Inferential Statistics.J. D. Trout - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:190 - 199.
Stranded statistical paradigms: The last crusade.Judith Glück & Oliver Vitouch - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):200-201.
One- and two-tailed tests.Melvin R. Marks - 1953 - Psychological Review 60 (3):207-208.
Statistical Data and Mathematical Propositions.Cory Juhl - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1):100-115.
One-tailed tests and "unexpected" results.Marvin R. Goldfried - 1959 - Psychological Review 66 (1):79-80.
Stimuli and subjects in one-tailed tests.Jonathan Baron - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (6):608-610.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
35 (#468,960)

6 months
6 (#581,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references