Quine's ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’: or The Power of Bad Logic

Philosophical Investigations 18 (4):305-328 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a critical examination of Quine's "Two Dogmas" that leaves nothing much of Quine's paper still standing. It concludes with a short study of a bit of bad work in philosophy that results from following the doctrines of "Two Dogmas"

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2008

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9205.1995.tb00334.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Gonseth and Quine.Michael Esfeld - 2001 - Dialectica 55 (3):199–219.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Revisability and Conceptual Change in "Two Dogmas of Empiricism".David J. Chalmers - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy 108 (8):387-415.
Two dogmas of empiricism. Fifty years after.Herbert Schnädelbach - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):7-12.
Challenges to empiricism.Harold Morick (ed.) - 1972 - Belmont, Calif.,: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
‘Two Dogmas’ -- All Bark and No Bite?: Carnap and Quine on Analyticity.Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
Two Dogmas of Analytical Philosophy.Greg Taylor - 2007 - Macalester Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):40-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
99 (#171,615)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references