Quine's ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’: or The Power of Bad Logic

Philosophical Investigations 18 (4):305-328 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a critical examination of Quine's "Two Dogmas" that leaves nothing much of Quine's paper still standing. It concludes with a short study of a bit of bad work in philosophy that results from following the doctrines of "Two Dogmas"

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gonseth and Quine.Michael Esfeld - 2001 - Dialectica 55 (3):199–219.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Two dogmas of empiricism. Fifty years after.Herbert Schnädelbach - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):7-12.
Challenges to empiricism.Harold Morick (ed.) - 1972 - Belmont, Calif.,: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
‘Two Dogmas’ -- All Bark and No Bite?: Carnap and Quine on Analyticity.Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
Two Dogmas of Analytical Philosophy.Greg Taylor - 2007 - Macalester Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):40-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
99 (#169,917)

6 months
4 (#724,033)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references