Why It Is Difficult To Defend the Plantinga‐Type Ontological Argument

Heythrop Journal 63 (2):196-209 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Heythrop Journal, Volume 63, Issue 2, Page 196-209, March 2022.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ontological argument.Graham Oppy - 2008 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of religion: classic and contemporary issues. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
O Argumento Ontológico de Plantinga.Nelson Gonçalves Gomes - 2011 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 56 (2):47-63.
Ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What kind of Classical Foundationalism has Plantinga refuted?Ralf-Thomas Klein - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):304-311.
What kind of Classical Foundationalism has Plantinga refuted?R.-T. Klein - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (3).
Plantinga's Modal Argument for the Existence of God.William Bruce Johnston - 1980 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Albany
God and empty terms.Charles Sayward - 1985 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18 (3):149 - 152.
Plantinga, God, and (yet) other minds.Robert J. Richman - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):40 – 54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-20

Downloads
165 (#119,882)

6 months
38 (#100,435)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Modal Ontological Arguments.Gregory R. P. Stacey - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (8):e12938.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references