The Consistency of Plantinga’s Argument Against Naturalism

Philo 7 (1):122-125 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Matthew Tedesco has argued that Alvin Plantinga’s argument that belief in naturalistic evolution is self-defeating entails, according to a parallel argument, that theistic belief is self-defeating for the same reasons. I defend Plantinga against this charge by arguing that the parallel argument is unsound.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
56 (#293,598)

6 months
6 (#587,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Vogelstein
Duquesne University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references