The Five Forms of the Ad Hominem Fallacy

Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 14 (1):19-36 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Equivocating the ad hominem.Daniel Putman - 2010 - Philosophy 85 (4):551-555.
What is the Fallacy of Hypostatization?S. Morris Engel - 1995 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 14 (4):42-51.
Do Critics of Heidegger Commit the Ad Hominem Fallacy?Daniel A. Dombrowski - 1996 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (2):71-75.
Lightening up on the Ad Hominem.John Woods - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):109-134.
Introduction to ‘Philosophy and Argumentum ad Hominem’.Douglas Walton - 1993 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 12 (3-4):24-24.
Attacking authority.Matthews Steve - 2011 - Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 13 (2):59-70.
Poisoning the Well.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):273-307.
Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony.Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109.
Two Fallacies.James Cargile - 2010 - Logos and Episteme 1 (2):257-268.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
66 (#245,871)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The pragma-dialectical analysis of the ad hominem fallacy.David Hitchcock - 2006 - In F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M. (eds.), Considering pragma-dialectics: a festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates. pp. 103.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references