Defeating dr. evil with self-locating belief

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):383–396 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dr. Evil learns that a duplicate of Dr. Evil has been created. Upon learning this, how seriously should he take the hypothesis that he himself is that duplicate? I answer: very seriously. I defend a principle of indifference for self-locating belief which entails that after Dr. Evil learns that a duplicate has been created, he ought to have exactly the same degree of belief that he is Dr. Evil as that he is the duplicate. More generally, the principle shows that there is a sharp distinction between ordinary skeptical hypotheses, and self-locating skeptical hypotheses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
313 (#8,315)

6 months
16 (#899,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Elga
Princeton University

Citations of this work

The new growing block theory vs presentism.Kristie Miller - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (3):223-251.

View all 76 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical papers.David Kellogg Lewis - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Philosophical Papers Vol. II.David K. Lewis (ed.) - 1986 - Oxford University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references