Self-locating Uncertainty and the Origin of Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1):axw004 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A longstanding issue in attempts to understand the Everett (Many-Worlds) approach to quantum mechanics is the origin of the Born rule: why is the probability given by the square of the amplitude? Following Vaidman, we note that observers are in a position of self-locating uncertainty during the period between the branches of the wave function splitting via decoherence and the observer registering the outcome of the measurement. In this period it is tempting to regard each branch as equiprobable, but we argue that the temptation should be resisted. Applying lessons from this analysis, we demonstrate (using methods similar to those of Zurek's envariance-based derivation) that the Born rule is the uniquely rational way of apportioning credence in Everettian quantum mechanics. In doing so, we rely on a single key principle: changes purely to the environment do not affect the probabilities one ought to assign to measurement outcomes in a local subsystem. We arrive at a method for assigning probabilities in cases that involve both classical and quantum self-locating uncertainty. This method provides unique answers to quantum Sleeping Beauty problems, as well as a well-defined procedure for calculating probabilities in quantum cosmological multiverses with multiple similar observers.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

In defence of the self-location uncertainty account of probability in the many-worlds interpretation.Kelvin J. McQueen & Lev Vaidman - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 66 (C):14-23.
Locating Oneself in a Quantum World.Charles Thorne Sebens - 2015 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Epistemic Separability and Everettian Branches: A Critique of Sebens and Carroll.Richard Dawid & Simon Friederich - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (3):711-721.
Quantum probability and many worlds.Meir Hemmo - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (2):333-350.
Everettian quantum mechanics and physical probability: Against the principle of “State Supervenience”.Lina Jansson - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 53:45-53.
Probability in the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Lev Vaidman - 2012 - In Yemima Ben-Menahem & Meir Hemmo, Probability in Physics. Springer. pp. 299--311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-16

Downloads
1,229 (#17,438)

6 months
219 (#17,472)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sean M. Carroll
Johns Hopkins University
Charles Sebens
California Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

Realism about the wave function.Eddy Keming Chen - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (7):e12611.
Strong Determinism.Eddy Keming Chen - 2024 - Philosophers' Imprint 24 (1).

View all 55 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Attitudes de dicto and de se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
Personal identity.Derek Parfit - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (January):3-27.

View all 63 references / Add more references