Louis Armstrong and the Syntax of Scat

Critical Inquiry 28 (3):618-649 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unbalanced human apes and syntax.Roger S. Fouts & Gabriel Waters - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):221-222.
Krüger’s Syntax Revived. [REVIEW]A. Rijksbaron - 2005 - The Classical Review 55 (02):479-.
"Mirror images" are physical objects: A reply to mr. Armstrong.M. Arthadeva - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):160 – 162.
Armstrong's Conception of Supervenience.Markku Keinänen - 2008 - In Tim de Mey & Markku Keinänen (eds.), Problems From Armstrong. Acta Philosophica Fennica 84. pp. 51.
Logical Syntax, Quasi-Syntax.Iacques Bouveresse - 2009 - In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 167.
Does 'ought' conversationally implicate 'can'?Bart Streumer - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):219–228.
Syntax, or, the embryogenesis of meaning.Paul J. M. Jorion - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1027-1028.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
19 (#798,463)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Language, meaning, modernity, and doowop.David Samuels - 2004 - Semiotica 2004 (149):297-323.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references