"Mirror images" are physical objects: A reply to mr. Armstrong

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):160 – 162 (1960)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author thinks d m armstrong has correctly explicated his own earlier analysis but that his criticisms are unfounded. The position armstrong takes is actually analogous to the author's in terms of right-Left distortion in mirrors. The author concludes that armstrong should say what "people are doing if they are not perceiving" which would take him into the "quagmire of sense-Data theories." (staff)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#318,199)

6 months
6 (#520,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mirrors and Misleading Appearances.Vivian Mizrahi - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (2):354-367.
Recorded Sounds and Auditory Media.Vivian Mizrahi - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (4):1551-1567.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references