A built-in objection against if-I-were-a-horse argument

Abstract

Max Gluckman introduces us to if-I-were-a-horse arguments, but what is wrong with them? In this paper, I draw attention to an objection built-in to the terminology.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Impure reference: A way around the concept horse paradox.Fraser MacBride - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):297-312.
Kant’s Neglected Objection to the Ontological Argument.Michael R. Slater - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (2):179--184.
Meinong und die Gegenstandstheorie.Terence Parsons - 1995 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 50:145-161.
Meinongian Semantics Generalized.Terence Parsons - 1995 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 50 (1):145-161.
Meinongian Semantics Generalized.Terence Parsons - 1995 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 50 (1):145-161.
The “white horse is not horse” debate.Lisa Indraccolo - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (10):e12434.
Prolegomena to future solutions to "white-horse not horse".Chad Hansen - 2007 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (4):473–491.
A double-reference account: Gongsun long's "white-horse-not-horse" thesis.M. O. U. BO - 2007 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (4):493–513.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-16

Downloads
107 (#164,299)

6 months
50 (#87,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references