Bi-Logic and Multi-Modal Argumentation: Understanding Emotional Arguments

Abstract

According to Bi-logic theory, there are two logics operating in the mind. One is traditional logic, and the other one is called “symmetrical”, because it does not respect asymmetrical relations. Bi-logic assumes that mental processes involve combinations of both logics in different proportions. From that perspective, Michael Gilbert’s theory of Multi-Modal argumentation is discussed focusing upon emotional arguments. It is claimed that these arguments are bi-logical, that is, they contain a combination of traditional and symmetrical logics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Dissent in the Midst of Emotional Territory.Linda Carozza - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (2):197-210.
Term-modal logics.Melvin Fitting, Lars Thalmann & Andrei Voronkov - 2001 - Studia Logica 69 (1):133-169.
Multi-modal argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (2):159-177.
Multi-Dimensional Semantics for Modal Logics.Maarten Marx - 1996 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37 (1):25-34.
A theory of hypermodal logics: Mode shifting in modal logic. [REVIEW]D. M. Gabbay - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (3):211-243.
The Unrestricted Combination of Temporal Logic Systems.Marcelo Finger & M. Weiss - 2002 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 10 (2):165-189.
Arrow logic and infinite counting.Ágnes Kurucz - 2000 - Studia Logica 65 (2):199-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
23 (#677,046)

6 months
9 (#300,363)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Claudio Duran
York University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inquiry.Robert C. Stalnaker - 1984 - Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (4):515-519.
The Interpretation of Dreams.Sigmund Freud & A. A. Brill - 1900 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 10 (20):551-555.
Inquiry.Jon Barwise - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (3):429.
Coalescent argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.
Impossible possible worlds vindicated.Jaakko Hintikka - 1975 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (4):475 - 484.

View all 9 references / Add more references