The Incoherence of the Moral 'Ought'

Philosophy 70 (271):69 - 85 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Elizabeth Anscombe's paper ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’ 1 seems clearly to have failed in its task. Kurt Baier describes the paper as ‘widely discussed and much admired’ 2 and Peter Winch has called one of its three theses ‘enormously influential’ 3 within moral philosophy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revisiting Modern Moral Philosophy.Jennifer A. Frey - 2020 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 87:61-83.
The Three Faces of Flourishing.Thomas Hurka - 1999 - Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (1):44.
Aristotle for the Modern Ethicist.Sophia Connell - 2019 - Ancient Philosophy Today 1 (2):192-214.
Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Does Modern Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?Roger Crisp - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 54:75-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
39 (#421,117)

6 months
8 (#415,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Does Modern Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?Roger Crisp - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 54:75-93.
Moral Escapism and Applied Ethics.Lars Hertzberg - 2002 - Philosophical Papers 31 (3):251-270.
Anscombe on the Moral Ought and Moral Corruption.Olli Lagerspetz - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (3):435-455.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Dog that Gave Himself the Moral Law.Cora Diamond - 1988 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13 (1):161-179.

Add more references