On withholding nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill: has palliative medicine gone too far? A reply

Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (3):141-143 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Patients who are dying of cancer usually give up eating and then stop drinking. This raises ethical dilemmas about providing nutritional support and fluid replacement. The decision-making process should be based on a knowledge of the risks and benefits of giving or withholding treatments. There is no clear evidence that increased nutritional support or fluid therapy alters comfort, mental status or survival of patients who are dying. Rarely, subcutaneous fluid administration in the dying patient may be justified if the family remain distressed despite due consideration of the lack of medical benefit versus the risks. Some cancer patients who are not imminently dying become dehydrated from reversible conditions such as hypercalcaemia. This may mimic the effects of advanced cancer. These conditions should be sought and fluid replacement therapy should be given along with the specific treatments for the condition

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Terminal sedation and the "imminence condition".V. Cellarius - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):69-72.
Comment on Hospice of Washington's Policy.John A. Robertson - 1991 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1 (2):139-140.
Medical Futility and Physician Assisted Death.Nancy S. Jecker - 2015 - In Michael Cholbi & Jukka Varelius (eds.), New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 203-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
66 (#240,031)

6 months
6 (#701,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?