- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Navigating End-of-Life Decisions Using Informed Nondissent
American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):42-43 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Integrating Informed Nondissent Into Informed Consent Standards.Alexander A. Kon - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (11):20-21.
Informed Nondissent at the Limits of Viability.Noah M. Kon & Alexander A. Kon - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):54-56.
An Engine, Not a Pyramid.Armando Menéndez Viso & Antonio Casado da Rocha - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):81-83.
The Problem With Home Remedies: Manitoba, Doctors and Unilateral Decisions in End-of-Life Care.Pat Murphy, George Webster & Brian Chaze - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):71-73.
Ms X: A Promising New View of Anorexia Nervosa, Futility, and End-of-Life Decisions in a Very Recent English Case.Robin Mackenzie - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (7):57-58.
Our cultures, our selves: Toward an honest dialogue on race and end-of-life decisions.Mark G. Kuczewski - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):13 – 17.
Navigating the Liminal State Between Life and Death: Clinician Moral Distress and Uncertainty Regarding New Life-Sustaining Technologies.Elizabeth Dzeng - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (2):22-25.
Decisions at the end of life—the abuse of the concept of futility.E. D. Pellegrino - 2005 - Practical Bioethics 1 (3).
The Continuing Complexity of End-of-Life Decisions.John D. Lantos - 2015 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (2):51-52.
What we do not know about racial/ethnic discrimination in end-of-life treatment decisions.Ellen W. Bernal - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):21 – 23.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-03-22
Downloads
35 (#771,870)
6 months
8 (#707,720)
2019-03-22
Downloads
35 (#771,870)
6 months
8 (#707,720)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Informed Nondissent at the Limits of Viability.Noah M. Kon & Alexander A. Kon - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):54-56.
The Equivalence Thesis: Why Timers Do Not Successfully Resuscitate the Acts/Omissions and Withdrawal/Withholding Debate.Dominic Wilkinson, Ella Butcherine & Julian Savulescu - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):W6-W9.
References found in this work
Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethically Equivalent?Lars Øystein Ursin - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):10-20.
Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent.E. Gedge, M. Giacomini & D. Cook - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (4):215-218.
Informed Non-Dissent: A Better Option Than Slow Codes When Families Cannot Bear to Say “Let Her Die”.Alexander A. Kon - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11):22-23.
The “Window of Opportunity:” Helping Parents Make the Most Difficult Decision They Will Ever Face Using an Informed Non-Dissent Model.Alexander A. Kon - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (4):55-56.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6dc498764b-nlds7 uwo