- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Twenty Years of Human Research Ethics Committees in the Baltic States
Vilius Dranseika, Eugenijus Gefenas, Asta Cekanauskaite, Kristina Hug, Signe Mezinska, Eimantas Peicius, Vents Silis, Andres Soosaar & Martin Strosberg
Developing World Bioethics 11 (1):48-54 (2011)
Abstract
Two decades have passed since the first attempts were made to establish systematic ethical review of human research in the Baltic States. Legally and institutionally much has changed. In this paper we provide an historical and structural overview of ethical review of human research and identify some problems related to the role of ethical review in establishing quality research environment in these countries. Problems connected to (a) public availability of information, (b) management of conflicts of interest, (c) REC composition and motivation of REC members, and (d) differing levels of stringency of ethical review for different types of studies, are identified. Recommendations are made to strengthen cooperation among the Baltic RECs.Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
Twenty years of human research ethics committees in the baltic states.Vilius Dranseika, Eugenijus Gefenas, Asta Cekanauskaite, H. U. G. Kristina, Signe Mezinska, Eimantas Peicius, Vents Silis, Andres Soosaar & Martin Strosberg - 2010 - Developing World Bioethics 11 (1):48-54.
Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?E. Gefenas, V. Dranseika, A. Cekanauskaite, K. Hug, S. Mezinska, E. Peicius, V. Silis, A. Soosaar & M. Strosberg - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (7):435-439.
Tis but a scratch: The human tissue act and the use of tissue for research, issues for research ethics committees.David Hunter - unknown
Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.Leslie Gelling & Carol Munn-Giddings - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):100-106.
Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority.S. McGuinness - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):695-700.
Research on human subjects: Australian ethics committees take tentative steps.L. W. Osborne - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):66-68.
Ethics committees. Research ethics: beyond the guidelines.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 2001 - Developing World Bioethics 1 (1):57.
Research ethics committees at work: the experience of one multi-location study.A. E. While - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):352-355.
The Case against Ethics Review in the Social Sciences.Zachary M. Schrag - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (4):120-131.
OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories.Helen McGough - 1997 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 20 (1):9-11.
The ghana experience.Paulina Tindana & Okyere Boateng - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (4):277-281.
Hospital Clinical Ethics Committees. The Geneva Experience - Switzerland.Jean-Claude Chevrolet & Bara Ricou - 2009 - Diametros 22:21-38.
Ethical review issues in collaborative research between us and low – middle income country partners: A case example.Scott Mcintosh, Essie Sierra, Ann Dozier, Sergio Diaz, Zahira Quiñones, Aron Primack, Gary Chadwick & Deborah J. Ossip-Klein - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (8):414-422.
The silent majority: Who speaks at IRB meetings.Philip J. Candilis, Charles W. Lidz, Paul S. Appelbaum, Robert M. Arnold, William P. Gardner, Suzanne Myers, Albert J. Grudzinskas Jr & Lorna J. Simon - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (4):15-20.
The ethical review of student research in the context of the governance arrangements for research ethics committees.R. Ashcroft & M. Parker - 2003 - In Sue Eckstein (ed.), Manual for research ethics committees. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-14
Downloads
40 (#398,309)
6 months
11 (#237,895)
2013-12-14
Downloads
40 (#398,309)
6 months
11 (#237,895)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Failures in Clinical Trials in the European Union: Lessons from the Polish Experience.Marcin Waligora - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1087-1098.
Publication Ethics in Biomedical Journals from Countries in Central and Eastern Europe.Mindaugas Broga, Goran Mijaljica, Marcin Waligora, Aime Keis & Ana Marusic - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics (1):1-11.
Publication Ethics in Biomedical Journals from Countries in Central and Eastern Europe.Mindaugas Broga, Goran Mijaljica, Marcin Waligora, Aime Keis & Ana Marusic - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):99-109.
Public awareness of and attitudes towards research biobanks in Latvia.S. Mezinska, J. Kaleja, I. Mileiko, D. Santare, V. Rovite & L. Tzivian - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-11.
Broadening the “Infrastructure Effect”: Lessons from the Early Development of Research Ethics in Eastern Europe.Vilius Dranseika, Eugenijus Gefenas & Marcin Waligora - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (6):26-28.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-b9rvg uwo