Open sets satisfying systems of congruences

Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (2):247-303 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A famous result of Hausdorff states that a sphere with countably many points removed can be partitioned into three pieces A, B, C such that A is congruent to B, B is congruent to C, and A is congruent to B ∪ C; this result was the precursor of the Banach–Tarski paradox. Later, R. Robinson characterized the systems of congruences like this which could be realized by partitions of the sphere with rotations witnessing the congruences. The pieces involved were nonmeasurable. In the present paper, we consider the problem of which systems of congruences can be satisfied using open subsets of the sphere ; of course, these open sets cannot form a partition of the sphere, but they can be required to cover "most of" the sphere in the sense that their union is dense. Various versions of the problem arise, depending on whether one uses all isometries of the sphere or restricts oneself to a free group of rotations, or whether one omits the requirement that the open sets have dense union, and so on. While some cases of these problems are solved by simple geometrical dissections, others involve complicated iterative constructions and/or results from the theory of free groups. Many interesting questions remain open.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-02

Downloads
10 (#1,204,152)

6 months
5 (#836,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Solutions to congruences using sets with the property of baire.Randall Dougherty - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (2):221-245.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Solutions to congruences using sets with the property of baire.Randall Dougherty - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (2):221-245.

Add more references