Narrow coverings of ω-ary product spaces

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (1):47-91 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Results of Sierpiski and others have shown that certain finite-dimensional product sets can be written as unions of subsets, each of which is ‘narrow’ in a corresponding direction; that is, each line in that direction intersects the subset in a small set. For example, if the set ω × ω is partitioned into two pieces along the diagonal, then one piece meets every horizontal line in a finite set, and the other piece meets each vertical line in a finite set. Such partitions or coverings can exist only when the sets forming the product are of limited size.This paper considers such coverings for products of infinitely many sets . In this case, a covering of the product by narrow sets, one for each coordinate direction, will exist no matter how large the factor sets are. But if one restricts the sets used in the covering , then the existence of narrow coverings is related to a number of large cardinal properties: partition cardinals, the free subset problem, nonregular ultrafilters, and so on.One result given here is a relative consistency proof for a hypothesis used by S. Mrówka to produce a counterexample in the dimension theory of metric spaces

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Uniform domain representations of "Lp" -spaces.Petter K. Køber - 2007 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (2):180-205.
Toward a rigorous quantum field theory.Stanley Gudder - 1994 - Foundations of Physics 24 (9):1205-1225.
Reduced coproducts of compact hausdorff spaces.Paul Bankston - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (2):404-424.
An Estimate for the Dimension of the Product of Two Vector Spaces.I. Connell - 1977 - History and Philosophy of Logic 4 (4):273-275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
28 (#555,203)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
[Omnibus Review].Yiannis N. Moschovakis - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (3):471-472.
Every analytic set is Ramsey.Jack Silver - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):60-64.
The strenght of the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Moti Gitik - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 51 (3):215-240.
Some weak versions of large cardinal axioms.Keith J. Devlin - 1973 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 5 (4):291.

View all 12 references / Add more references