Solutions to congruences using sets with the property of baire

Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (2):221-245 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hausdorff's paradoxical decomposition of a sphere with countably many points removed actually produced a partition of this set into three pieces A,B,C such that A is congruent to B, B is congruent to C, and A is congruent to B ∪ C. While refining the Banach–Tarski paradox, R. Robinson characterized the systems of congruences like this which could be realized by partitions of the sphere with rotations witnessing the congruences: the only nontrivial restriction is that the system should not require any set to be congruent to its complement. Later, J. F. Adams showed that this restriction can be removed if one allows arbitrary isometries of the sphere to witness the congruences. The purpose of this paper is to characterize those systems of congruences which can be satisfied by partitions of the sphere or related spaces into sets with the property of Baire. A paper of Dougherty and Foreman gives a proof that the Banach–Tarski paradox can be achieved using such sets, and gives versions of this result using open sets and related results about partitions of spaces into congruent sets. The same method is used here; it turns out that only one additional restriction on a system of congruences is needed to make it solvable using subsets of the sphere with the property of Baire with free rotations witnessing the congruences. Actually, the result applies to any complete metric space acted on in a sufficiently free way by a free group of homeomorphisms. We also characterize the systems solvable on the sphere using sets with the property of Baire but allowing all isometries.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Extending Baire property by uncountably many sets.Paweł Kawa & Janusz Pawlikowski - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (3):896-904.
Mathias absoluteness and the Ramsey property.Lorenz Halbeisen & Haim Judah - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):177-194.
Dominating projective sets in the Baire space.Otmar Spinas - 1994 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 68 (3):327-342.
Large cardinals and projective sets.Haim Judah & Otmar Spinas - 1997 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 36 (2):137-155.
Making doughnuts of Cohen reals.Lorenz Halbeisen - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (2):173-178.
Open sets satisfying systems of congruences.Randall Dougherty - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (2):247-303.
▵13-sets of reals.Haim Judah & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):72 - 80.
$triangle^1_3$-Sets of Reals.Haim Judah & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):72-80.
Powers of 2.Kyriakos Keremedis & Horst Herrlich - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3):346-351.
Powers of.Kyriakos Keremedis & Horst Herrlich - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3):346-351.
Decomposing baire functions.J. Cichoń, M. Morayne, J. Pawlikowski & S. Solecki - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (4):1273 - 1283.
A minimal counterexample to universal baireness.Kai Hauser - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1601-1627.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-02

Downloads
11 (#1,137,779)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Open sets satisfying systems of congruences.Randall Dougherty - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (2):247-303.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Open sets satisfying systems of congruences.Randall Dougherty - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (2):247-303.

Add more references