Size and Function

Erkenntnis 83 (4):853-873 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Are there different sizes of infinity? That is, are there infinite sets of different sizes? This is one of the most natural questions that one can ask about the infinite. But it is of course generally taken to be settled by mathematical results, such as Cantor’s theorem, to the effect that there are infinite sets without bijections between them. These results settle the question, given an almost universally accepted principle relating size to the existence of functions. The principle is: for any sets A and B, if A is the same size as B, then there is a bijection from A to B. The aim of the paper, however, is to argue that this question is in fact wide open: to argue that we are not in a position to know the answer, because we are not in one to know the principle. The aim, that is, is to argue that for all we know there is only one size of infinity.

Similar books and articles

An Aristotelian notion of size.Vieri Benci, Mauro Di Nasso & Marco Forti - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 143 (1-3):43-53.
Set Size and the Part–Whole Principle.Matthew W. Parker - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic (4):1-24.
Wide Sets, ZFCU, and the Iterative Conception.Christopher Menzel - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (2):57-83.
What is the infinite?Øystein Linnebo - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 61:42-47.
Taming the infinite.A. W. Moore - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):53-56.
Minimum-sized Infinite Partitions of Boolean Algebras.J. Monk - 1996 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 42 (1):537-550.
The structure of amorphous sets.J. K. Truss - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 73 (2):191-233.
An isolic generalization of Cauchy's theorem for finite groups.J. C. E. Dekker - 1990 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 29 (4):231-236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-11

Downloads
279 (#69,833)

6 months
63 (#68,332)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruno Whittle
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

In defense of Countabilism.David Builes & Jessica M. Wilson - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (7):2199-2236.
Cantor, Choice, and Paradox.Nicholas DiBella - forthcoming - The Philosophical Review.
Might All Infinities Be the Same Size?Alexander R. Pruss - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (3):604-617.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
The Construction of Logical Space.Agustín Rayo - 2013 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Frege's conception of numbers as objects.Crispin Wright - 1983 - [Aberdeen]: Aberdeen University Press.
Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects.Crispin Wright - 1983 - Critical Philosophy 1 (1):97.

View all 19 references / Add more references