European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):63--86 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Should religious believers proportion their religious beliefs to their evidence? They should: Religious faith is better, ceteris paribus, when the beliefs accompanying it are evidence-proportioned. I offer two philosophical arguments and a biblical argument. The philosophical arguments conclude that love and trust, two attitudes belonging to faith, are better, ceteris paribus, when accompanied by evidence-proportioned belief, and that so too is the faith in question. The biblical argument concludes that beliefs associated with faith, portrayed in the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, are typically, and normatively, exhorted on the basis of evidence. I hope to convince religious believers and nonbelievers alike that religious beliefs should be evidence-proportioned.
|
Keywords | religious evidentialism, religious belief, rationality and religious belief |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.24204/ejpr.v5i2.234 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):452-458.
Subjective Probability: The Real Thing.Richard Jeffrey - 2002 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
View all 14 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Empathy and Divine Union in Kierkegaard: Solving the Faith/History Problem in Philosophical Fragments.Joshua Cockayne - 2015 - Religious Studies 51 (4):455-476.
Similar books and articles
Evidence and Religious Belief.Raymond VanArragon & Kelly James Clark (eds.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Phenomenal Conservatism and Evidentialism in Religious Epistemology.Chris Tucker - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press. pp. 52--73.
Evidentialism and Faith: Believing in Order to Know.John Zeis - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:185-200.
Evidentialism and Faith: Believing in Order to Know.John Zeis - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:185-200.
Bayle on the (Ir)Rationality of Religious Belief.Kristen Irwin - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (6):560-569.
Religious Pluralism and the Rationality of Religious Belief.John Hick - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (2):242-249.
Deciding to Believe: The Ethics and Rationality of Religious Belief.John Bishop - 1995 - Sophia 34 (1):9-31.
Can Religious Arguments "Persuade"?Jennifer Faust - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1-3):71-86.
Pt. 2. The Relation of Beliefs to Evidence. Theistic Proofs, Person Relativity, and the Rationality of Religious Belief.William J. Wainwright - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-07-25
Total views
217 ( #51,547 of 2,499,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #39,210 of 2,499,013 )
2014-07-25
Total views
217 ( #51,547 of 2,499,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #39,210 of 2,499,013 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads