Thoughts on Film: Critically engaging with both Adorno and Benjamin

Educational Philosophy and Theory 48 (6):622-637 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


There is a traditional debate in analytic aesthetics that surrounds the classification of film as Art. While much philosophy devoted to considering film has now moved beyond this debate and accepts film as a mass art, a sub-category of Art proper, it is worth re-considering the criticism of film pre-Deleuze. Much of the criticism of film as pseudo-art is expressed in moral terms. T. W. Adorno, for example, critiques film as ‘mass-cult’; mass produced culture which presents a ‘flattened’ version of reality. Adorno worries about the passivity encouraged in viewers. Films are narrative artworks, received by an audience in a context, making the focus on the reception of the work important. The dialogue held between Adorno and Walter Benjamin post-WWII is interesting because, between them, they consider both the possible positive emancipatory and negative politicization effects of film as a mass produced and distributed story-telling medium. Reading Adorno alongside Benjamin is a way to highlight the role of the critical thinker who receives the film. Arguing that the critical thinker is a valuable citizen, this paper focuses on the value of critical thinking in the reception of cinematic artworks. It achieves this by reconsidering Adorno and Benjamin 's theories of mass art.


Added to PP

1,449 (#7,648)

6 months
264 (#8,887)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laura D'Olimpio
University of Birmingham

References found in this work

The principles of art.R. G. Collingwood - 1938 - New York,: Oxford University Press.
The Principles of Art.R. G. Collingwood - 1938 - Philosophy 13 (52):492-496.
The Principles of Art.R. G. Collingwood - 1938 - New York,: Oxford University Press USA.
Prisms.Theodor W. Adorno (ed.) - 1981 - MIT Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references