Filozofija I Društvo 22 (3):27-44 (2011)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
The author insists that, within contemporary theory, common division of social contract tradition on?Hobbesian? and?Kantian? line of thought is entirely justified. Analyzing the theories of David Gauthier and Thomas Scanlon, he also indicates the important difference between?moral? and?political? dimension of the idea of social contract. Finally, he rejects recent attempts of identifying contractualism with constructivism. Autor nastoji da pokaze da je uobicajena podela na?hobsovsku? i?kantovsku? liniju misljenja u sklopu savremene recepcije tradicije drustvenog ugovora potpuno opravdana. U tekstu se takodje naglasava kako se ideja drustvenog kao?moralnog? ugovora, nasuprot izvornijem?politickom? ugovoru, artikulise tek u poznoj?evolucionoj? fazi te ideje, narocito u dvadesetom veku. Najposle, odbacuje se pokusaj redefinisanja kontraktualizma kao neke vrste?konstruktivizma?, buduci da u kontraktualizmu nema nikakvih elemenata?proceduralnog? rasudjivanja koje je, prema opstem uverenju, karakteristicno za?konstruktivisticku? misao. PR Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 43007
|
| Keywords | social contract tradition, contractualism, contractarianism, constructivism, actual and hypothetical agreement, David Gauthier, Thomas Scanlon |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.2298/fid1103027d |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 69,177
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Deliberative Model of Contractualism.Nicholas Southwood - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):183-208.
The Burdens of Public Justification: Constructivism, Contractualism, and Publicity.Samuel Freeman - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (1):5-43.
‘Constructivism, Contractarianism and Basic Obligations: Kant and Gauthier’.Kenneth R. Westphal - forthcoming - In J.-C. Merle (ed.), Reading Kant’s Doctrine of Right.
Of Metaethics and Motivation: The Appeal of Contractualism.Pamela Hieronymi - 2011 - In R. Jay Wallace, Rahul Kumar & Samuel Richard Freeman (eds.), Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon. Oxford University Press.
Contractualism, Reciprocity, Compensation.David Alm - 2007 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2 (3):1-23.
Reconciling Justice and Pleasure in Epicurean Contractarianism.John J. Thrasher - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):423-436.
Contractualism, Spare Wheel, Aggregation.Brad Hooker - 2002 - In Matt Matravers (ed.), Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Frank Cass. pp. 53-76.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-01-17
Total views
88 ( #131,007 of 2,499,375 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,712 of 2,499,375 )
2014-01-17
Total views
88 ( #131,007 of 2,499,375 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,712 of 2,499,375 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
