Contextualizing Corporate Political Responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in Historical Perspective

Journal of Business Ethics 142 (4):641-661 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article provides a historical contextualization of Corporate Social Responsibility and its political role. CSR, we propose, is one form of business–society interactions reflecting a unique ideological framing. To make that argument, we compare contemporary CSR with two historical ideal-types. We explore in turn paternalism in nineteenth century Europe and managerial trusteeship in early twentieth century US. We outline how the political responsibilities of business were constructed, negotiated, and practiced in both cases. This historical contextualization shows that the frontier between economy and polity has always been blurry and shifting and that firms have played a political role for a very long time. It also allows us to show how the nature, extent, and impact of that political role changed through history and co-evolved in particular with shifts in dominant ideologies. Globalization, in that context, is not the driver of the political role of the firm but a moderating phenomenon contributing significantly to the dynamics of this shift. The comparison between paternalism, trusteeship, and contemporary CSR points to what can be seen as functional equivalents—alternative patterns of business–society interactions that each correspond, historically, to unique and distinct ideological frames. We conclude by drawing implications for future theorizing on CSR and stakeholder democracy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Neo-Kantian Foundation of Corporate Social Responsibility.Wim Dubbink & Luc van Liedekerke - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):117 - 136.
Corporate social responsibility-a SMME perspective.S. Viviers & D. J. Venter - 2007 - African Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1):20.
Corporate Responsibilities for Access to Medicines.Klaus M. Leisinger - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S1):3 - 23.
Corporate Responsibilities in Internet-Enabled Social Networks.Stephen Chen - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S4):523 - 536.
Corporate governance with a difference: Fiduciary duty for a wisdom economy.Laurent Leduc - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):147-161.
Evolutionary Patterns in the Political Strategy of a Firm.Mika Skippari - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:279-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
34 (#420,338)

6 months
6 (#252,172)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Brief History of Neoliberalism.David Harvey - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Ideology: a multidisciplinary approach.Teun Adrianus van Dijk - 1998 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Responsibility and Global Labor Justice.Iris Marion Young - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4):365-388.

View all 43 references / Add more references