Business Ethics Quarterly 27 (2):183-211 (2017)
AbstractABSTRACT:Deliberative democratic theory, commonly used to explore questions of “political” corporate social responsibility, has become prominent in the literature. This theory has been challenged previously for being overly sanguine about firm profit imperatives, but left unexamined is whether corporate contexts are appropriate contexts for deliberative theory in the first place. We explore this question using the case of Starbucks’ “Race Together” campaign to show that significant challenges exist to corporate deliberation, even in cases featuring genuinely committed firms. We return to the underlying social theory to show that this is not an isolated case: for-profit firms are predictably hostile contexts for deliberation, and significant normative and strategic problems can be expected should deliberative theory be imported uncritically to corporate contexts. We close with recent advances in deliberative democratic theory that might help update the PCSR project, and accommodate the application of deliberation to the corporate context, albeit with significant alterations.
Similar books and articles
Cheap Talk, Reinforcement Learning, and the Emergence of Cooperation.J. McKenzie Alexander - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):969-982.
Non-Uniqueness of Equilibrium Action Profiles with Equal Size in One-Shot Cheap-Talk Games.Irene Valsecchi - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (1):31-53.
Not so Cheap Talk: Costly and Discrete Communication. [REVIEW]Johanna Hertel & John Smith - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (2):267-291.
How Can “Cheap Talk” Yield Coordination, Given a Conflict?Mark Jeffreys - 2008 - Mind and Society 7 (1):95-108.
Talk is Cheap: Political Discourse in Malory's Morte Darthuf.Cory Rushton - 2002 - In Disputatio 5: Medieval Forms of Argument: Disputation and Debate. pp. 67 - 85.
When Deliberation Produces Extremism.David Schkade, Cass R. Sunstein & Reid Hastie - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2):227-252.
Corporate Moral Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Morals: A Critique of Palazzo/Scherer’s Communicative Framework. [REVIEW]Helmut Willke & Gerhard Willke - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1):27 - 38.
Worldwide Deliberation and Public Use of Reason Online.May Thorseth - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):243-252.
Moral Pluralism and Democratic Deliberation.Dimitri Alexander Landa - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota
Digital Deliberation?Chris Wisniewski - 2013 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 25 (2):245-259.
Rhetoric and International Relations.Cheap Talk - 2009 - In A. Lunsford, K. Wilson & R. Eberly (eds.), Sage Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Sage Publications. pp. 247.
Corporate Moral Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Morals: A Critique of Palazzo/Scherer’s Communicative Framework.Helmut Willke & Gerhard Willke - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1):27-38.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Stakeholder Dialogue as Agonistic Deliberation: Exploring the Role of Conflict and Self-Interest in Business-NGO Interaction.Teunis Brand, Vincent Blok & Marcel Verweij - 2020 - Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (1):3-30.
Contestation in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: Enhancing the Democratic Quality of Transnational Governance.Daniel Arenas, Laura Albareda & Jennifer Goodman - 2020 - Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (2):169-199.
Mind the Gap! The Challenges and Limits of (Global) Business Ethics.George Brenkert - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 155 (4):917-930.
Navigating Our Way Between Market and State.Jeffery Smith - 2019 - Business Ethics Quarterly 29 (1):127-141.
Prioritizing Democracy: A Commentary on Smith’s Presidential Address to the Society for Business Ethics.Abraham Singer & Amit Ron - 2020 - Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (1):139-153.
References found in this work
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Frank I. Michelman & Jurgen Habermas - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (6):307.
Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function.Michael C. Jensen - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):235-256.
Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework.Guido Palazzo & Andreas Georg Scherer - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):71-88.