Descartes, Husserl and Henry - Michel Henry’s Interpretation of the Cartesian cogito and Material Phenomenology -

Phenomenology and Contemporary Philosoph 80:1-32 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Michel Henry en de cartesiaanse ziel Van de fenomenologie.R. Welten - 1999 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 61 (4):729 - 746.
The Bifurcated Subject.Lilian Alweiss - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (3):415-434.
Phénoménologie et réalité matérielle.Beat Michel - 2014 - Studia Phaenomenologica 14:329-348.
Material phenomenology.Michel Henry - 2008 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Levinas's defense of Subjectivity of Descartes.Mohammad Asghari - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 3 (214):29-47.
We-Synthesis.Joseph Rivera - 2019 - Research in Phenomenology 49 (2):183-206.
Amo, Ergo Cogito: Phenomenology’s Non-Cartesian Augustinianism.Chad Engelland - 2021 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 95 (3):481-503.
Michel Henry's phenomenology of aesthetic experience and Husserlian intentionality.Jeremy H. Smith - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (2):191-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-11

Downloads
2 (#1,804,667)

6 months
1 (#1,471,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references