Directions for the Development of Social Sciences and Humanities in the Context of Creating Artificial General Intelligence

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 66 (4):26-51 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article explores the transformative impact on human and social sciences in response to anticipated societal shifts driven by the forthcoming proliferation of artificial systems, whose intelligence will match human capabilities. Initially, it was posited that artificial intelligence (AI) would excel beyond human abilities in computational tasks and algorithmic operations, leaving creativity and humanities as uniquely human domains. However, recent advancements in large language models have significantly challenged these conventional beliefs about AI’s limitations and strengths. It is projected that, in the near future, generative AI models will adeptly replicate individual qualities, desires, beliefs, opinions, and the essence of human identity and consciousness to a degree that is nearly indistinguishable from that of humans. This lends support to the connectionist approach to understanding consciousness, suggesting an inherent similarity between biological and artificial neural networks. The discussion posits two innovative areas of scientific inquiry: “mathematical anthropology” and “multi-dimensional calculus of value.” The former suggests that viewing human nature through a mathematical and calculative lens not only preserves but enriches our understanding of the complexity of anthropological experience and its perceived contradictions. The latter hypothesis explores how mathematical models could facilitate various social interactions. The advanced simulation capabilities of neural networks suggest that traditional social and political frameworks face a growing vulnerability to AI-driven manipulations. This trend underscores the urgency of developing social interaction models that incorporate explicitly defined calculative rules. In conclusion, the paper advocates for a paradigm shift in how mathematics is perceived – not merely as a tool for computation but as a foundational science for crafting sophisticated models. In conclusion, the article advocates for transitioning from perceiving mathematics solely as a science of computation to viewing it as a discipline dedicated to constructing various formalized models, thereby deepening our insight into the complexities of human and social phenomena.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disciplinary and Cognitive Status of Philosophy of Science.Vladimir Przhilenskiy - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 34:41-48.
Metodologii︠a︡ nauki i antropologii︠a︡.O. I. Genisaretskiĭ & A. P. Ogurt︠s︡ov (eds.) - 2012 - Moskva: Rossiĭskai︠a︡ akademii︠a︡ nauk, Institut filosofii.
Automated inauthenticity.Mark Ressler - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-10.
Connectionism and artificial intelligence: History and philosophical interpretation.Kenneth Aizawa - 1992 - Journal for Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 4:1992.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-19

Downloads
3 (#1,697,950)

6 months
3 (#987,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?