Against Superkitten Ethics

International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (4):429-436 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I here criticize the use of science-fiction examples in ethics, chiefly, though not solely, by defenders of abortion. We have no reliable intuitions concerning such examples—certainly nothing strong enough to set against the strong intuition that infanticide is virtually always wrong.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against Superkitten Ethics.Philip E. Devine - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (4):429-436.
Abortion and Infanticide. [REVIEW]Philip Turner - 1985 - International Philosophical Quarterly 25 (4):425-427.
The Ethics of Abortion. [REVIEW]S. Joseph W. Koterski - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (1):122-124.
Devine, Philip E. Natural Law Ethics. [REVIEW]John Goyette - 2001 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (4):914-915.
Ethics, Evil, and Fiction. [REVIEW]Nancy E. Snow - 1998 - International Philosophical Quarterly 38 (3):325-327.
Ethics, Evil, and Fiction. [REVIEW]Nancy E. Snow - 1998 - International Philosophical Quarterly 38 (3):325-327.
The Argument from Variation Against Using One’s Own Intuitions As Evidence.Esther Goh - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (2):95-110.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
25 (#620,189)

6 months
3 (#1,206,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Devine
Providence College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references