Policing Women to Protect Fetuses: Coercive Interventions During Pregnancy

In Wanda Teays (ed.), Analyzing Violence Against Women. Springer. pp. 95-111 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Women are routinely subjected to penetrating surveillance during pregnancy. On the surface, this may appear to flow from a cultural commitment to protect babies – a cultural practice of “better safe than sorry” that is particularly vigilant given the vulnerability of fetuses and babies. In reality, pregnancy occasions incursions against human rights and well-being that would be anathema in other contexts. Our cultural practices concerning risk in pregnancy are infused with oppressive norms about women’s responsibility for pregnancy outcomes and the demands of extreme self-sacrifice from women to protect their fetuses. Of particular concern is our culture’s willingness to enforce norms concerning risk during pregnancy using coercive measures including forced cesarean sections and criminal penalties for exposing fetuses to risk. This chapter will consider assaults on self-determination, bodily integrity and privacy inherent in such interventions, as well as the structural violence and “mangled pieties” that buttress such practices in our unjust society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Policing Pregnancy: The Law and Ethics of Obstetric Conflict. [REVIEW]Rodney Taylor - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 13 (1):38-38.
Selective reduction of pregnancy: a legal analysis.A. Hall - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (5):304-308.
The perils of protection: vulnerability and women in clinical research.Toby Schonfeld - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (3):189-206.
Attitudes of women to fetal tissue research.F. Anderson, A. Glasier, J. Ross & D. T. Baird - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):36-40.
Obstetric Autonomy and Informed Consent.Jessica Flanigan - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):225-244.
Experience as Evidence: Pregnancy Loss, Pragmatism, and Fetal Status.Amanda Roth - 2018 - Journal of Social Philosophy 49 (2):270-293.
Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
23 (#648,182)

6 months
9 (#259,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Debra Debruin
University of Minnesota

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references